Why Challenger Ad-Tech Brands Should Think Twice Before Hiring Senior Talent from FAANG Companies


When scaling or enhancing their workforce, ad-tech challenger brands often gaze towards the titans of industry—FAANG companies (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, Google)—hoping to attract leaders who can bring a wealth of experience and a track record of success. However, recruiting senior commercial talent from these giants is not always the most strategic move. Here I delve into why the impressive resumes of these veterans might not translate into success within the unique environment of a challenger ad-tech brand.

The Allure of Big Names:

The appeal is undeniable. Senior talent from FAANG companies typically brings a high level of expertise, proven success, and prestigious cachet. Their experience in navigating complex corporate landscapes and driving significant business outcomes is attractive. Yet, the transition from a market leader to a challenger brand could expose a mismatch in expectations and capabilities.

Cultural Fit and Flexibility:

One of the most significant challenges is the stark difference in corporate culture. FAANG companies have well-established processes and abundant resources. In contrast, challenger brands are usually more agile and may operate with more uncertainty and fewer resources. Senior talent from these large companies may struggle to adapt to a more dynamic environment where flexibility and a hands-on approach are crucial. The ability to wear multiple hats and make quick decisions without extensive hierarchical buffers can be a jarring adjustment.

Innovation vs. Execution:

At FAANG companies, the scale of operations often allows for specialization with a focus on optimizing and scaling existing solutions. Challenger ad-tech brands, however, require their leaders to be innovators and disruptors who are not just executing a playbook but writing it in real-time. The need for creative problem-solving and comfort with ambiguity is high, traits that are less emphasized in more structured and resource-rich environments.

Risk Tolerance and Entrepreneurial Spirit:

Risk tolerance is another critical factor. FAANG executives operate within the safety net of established brand reputation and extensive financial buffers. Challenger brands, by nature, require a higher risk tolerance and a spirit of entrepreneurship that can be at odds with the more risk-averse culture cultivated in big tech firms. The drive to push boundaries, experiment, and possibly fail before succeeding is essential in smaller, more nimble environments.

Resourcefulness Over Resources:

Senior leaders from market leaders are accustomed to having substantial resources at their disposal—be it talent, technology, or capital. In a challenger brand, the reality is often about doing more with less. This shift can lead to frustration and decreased effectiveness if a leader is not adept at resourcefulness and innovative budget management.

So what does it all mean?

While the skills and experiences of senior talent from FAANG companies are invaluable, challenger ad-tech brands must carefully consider whether these abilities align with their needs and culture. The successful candidate is someone who not only has the skills but also thrives in less structured, more fluid environments, and is driven by the challenge of building something new.

For challenger brands, the focus should be on finding adaptable, resilient leaders who are motivated by the opportunity to innovate and shape the industry from a different vantage point. Sometimes, the best candidate isn’t the one with the most impressive resume but the one who is most prepared to jump into the trenches with your team and lead from the front.


Are you a challenger brand looking to make strategic hires that align with your unique challenges and culture? Connect with us to explore how to find the right fit for your company’s growth trajectory and long-term success.

CONTACT US or try our scorecard by clicking below